In re Gubelman’s Empirical Analysis
10 F.2d 926 · 1925
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Somlyo v. J. Lu-Rob Enterprises, Inc. (1991), Lewis-Hall Iron Works v. Blair (1928)
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burton v. United States · United States v. Angeline Lombardo · White v. Stump · Everett v. Judson · St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Johnston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The word ‘filed’ has not been defined by Congress. It has, however, a well-defined meaning. It signifies the delivery into the actual custody of the proper officer, designated by the statute, and whose duty it is to keep the records of the court. It carries with it the idea of permanent preservation of the thing as a public record. A paper in a case is not filed until it is deposited with the clerk of the court, for the purpose of making it a part of the records in the case.” 2”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.