Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 F.3d 100 - United States v. DeRewal

United States v. DeRewal’s Empirical Analysis

10 F.3d 100 · 1993

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
1
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 18 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably United States v. Galloway (1995), United States v. Voigt (1996)

34 federal appellate · 18 district · 1 state decisions

5001993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 963 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Frady · Davis v. United States · Washington v. Harper · In re Disbarment of Graves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This theory, however, must confront the fact that our test for newly discovered evidence requires that the evidence “must be such, and of such nature, as that, on a new trial, the newly discovered evidence would probably produce an acquittal.” This language certainly suggests that newly discovered evidence must generally, if not always, be evidence related to the issues at trial, not evidence concerning separate legal claims such as ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]ttempting to shoehorn such [an ineffective assistance of counsel] claim into a Rule 33 newly discovered evidence motion is not an easy task.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not required to show `cause and prejudice' with respect to his failure to raise his ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.