Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 F.3d 1086 - United States v. Lewis

United States v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

10 F.3d 1086 · 1993

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
5
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably United States v. Francis (1999), United States v. Riascos-Suarez (1996)

52 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

4701993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1863

Relies on United States v. Olano · Duren v. Missouri · Green v. United States · Carstea v. Poplar Tree Homeowners Ass'n · Pledger v. Medlock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is to be applied 'sparingly' and saves only 'particularly egregious errors' in those circumstances 'in which a miscarriage of justice would otherwise result.' " Id. (citation omitted). 25 Improper vouching occurs when "the prosecutor's actions are such that a jury could reasonably believe that the prosecutor was indicating a personal belief in the credibility of the witness.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “explicit personal assurances that a witness is trustworthy or implicitly bolster the witness by indicating that information not presented to the jury supports the testimony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “right to explain its procedures and the relationship between the Government and its witnesses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.