United States v. Haddad’s Empirical Analysis
10 F.3d 1252 · 1993
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably United States v. Paladino (2005), United States v. Branch (1996)
46 federal appellate · 2 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Cooke v. United States · Baldwin v. New York · Vermont v. Cox · Hanil Bank v. Michelman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to clarify or explain the portion already received”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“If the defendant willfully obstructed or impeded, or attempted to obstruct or impede, the administration of justice during the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant offense, increase the offense level by 2 levels.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“find that the acts of the defendant alleged to obstruct or impede justice were done 'willfully' and with specific intent 'to avoid responsibility' for the offense for which he was being tried.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.