United States v. Neff’s Empirical Analysis
10 F.3d 1321 · 1993
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably United States v. Coffman (1996), United States v. Rodriguez (1995)
21 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 753
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Illinois v. Allen · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Bollenbach v. United States · Turner v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the district court had conducted its communications in open court as required by Rogers, then, pursuant to the Court Reporters Act, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 753(b), the district court would have been required to have a court reporter present at the proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] district judge, when faced with ... communications from the jury, should either follow the procedures in Rogers, or obtain from the defendant himself a clear and knowing waiver on the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the jury's message should [be] answered in open court and ... [defendant's] counsel should [be] given an opportunity to be heard before the trial judge respond[s].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.