United States v. Funmaker’s Empirical Analysis
10 F.3d 1327 · 1993
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2015
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 25 U.S.C. § 1302 (§ 202 of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968)
Relies on Baker v. Carr · United States v. Wheeler · Williams v. Lee · Katzenbach v. McClung · Samuel Worcester v. The State of Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when the application of a statute would affect Indian or tribal rights recognized by treaty or statute, or would affect rights essential to self-governance of intramural matters [unless] the law specifically ... evince[s] Congressional intent to interfere with those rights,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a bingo hall and casino [even one on tribal grounds] designed to attract tourists from surrounding states undeniably affects interstate commerce....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“statutes written in terms applying to all persons include members of Indian tribes as well.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.