Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 F.3d 204 - Houck v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University

Houck v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University’s Empirical Analysis

10 F.3d 204 · 1993

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Strag v. Board of Trustees (1995), Lavin-McEleney v. Marist College (2001)

15 federal appellate · 5 district ·

150199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963)

Relies on Cook v. CSX Transportation Corp. · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Aetna Insurance · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Liggett & Myers Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “isolated incidents or random comparisons demonstrating disparities in treatment may be insufficient to draw a prima facie inference of discrimination without additional evidence that the alleged phenomenon of inequality also exists with respect to the entire relevant group of employees.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “she (1) receives lower pay than a male co-employee (2) for performing work substantially equal in skill, effort, and responsibility [3] under similar working conditions. The comparison must be made 'factor by factor with the male comparator.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he plaintiff may not compare herself to a hypothetical male with a composite average of a group's skill, effort, and responsibility.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.