United States v. Boyle’s Empirical Analysis
10 F.3d 485 · 1993
Citation profile
64 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably United States v. Ross (1996), United States v. Emerson (1997)
64 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 656
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Oklahoma v. New Mexico · Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd. · United States v. Arvanitis · United States v. Mahoney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'whether the defendant ha[d] access or authority over valuable things'”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]f the defendant abused a position of public or private trust . . . in a manner that significantly facilitated the commission or concealment of the offense.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“thereby justifying an enhancement for abuse of a position of trust. Id. Further,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.