Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 F.3d 563 - Williams v. Carter

Williams v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

10 F.3d 563 · 1993

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably United States v. Haack (2005), Phillips v. Jasper County Jail (2006)

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

160199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Kern v. TXO Production Corp. · United States v. Dockery · United States v. Kramer · Johnson v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “continue to be alert to the possibility that, because of procedural complexities or other reasons, later developments in the case may show either that counsel should be appointed, or that strict procedural requirements should, in fairness, be relaxed to some degree.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.