Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 F.3d 910 - United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

10 F.3d 910 · 1993

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably United States v. Bennett (1994), In re Sealed Case (2001)

18 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Penn v. Parke State Bank · United States v. Wright · United States v. Sklar · United States v. Mocciola · United States v. Garcia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Only after the government has met its burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, a sufficient nexus between the [extraneous] conduct and the offense of conviction,' may the sentencing court, in its sound discretion, make a relevant conduct' adjustment.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “we repeatedly have upheld [the court's] reliance [at sentencing] on prior hearsay testimony never subjected to cross-examination, so long as there were other adequate indicia of reliability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.