Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 F.3d 915 - Adams v. Watson

Adams v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis

10 F.3d 915 · 1993

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
2
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 14 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Libertad v. Welch (1995), Katz v. Pershing, LLC (2012)

27 federal appellate · 14 district · 2 state decisions

2101993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 7 U.S.C. § 601

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Carnegie v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All predictions are conjectural to a degree .... Economics is a cross between an art and a science, which is to say, both an imperfect art and an imperfect science. While the law of supply and demand may sometimes be suspended by unpredictable marketplace decisions, and even lesser for-tuities like bovine obstinacy, basic economic theory quite consistently transcends utter randomness by positing elemental laws of cause and effect predicated on actual market experience and probable market behavior.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We in no way suggest, of course, that the second amended complaint’s portrayal of milk industry economics is beyond refutation either on summary judgment or at trial.”). . See, e.g., Adams, 10 F.3d at 922 (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[B]asic economic theory quite consistently transcends utter randomness by positing elemental laws of cause and effect predicated on actual market experience and probable market behavior.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.