Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 F.3d 925 - Marshall v. Switzer

Marshall v. Switzer’s Empirical Analysis

10 F.3d 925 · 1993

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Doe v. Pfrommer (1998), Kapps v. Wing (2005)

18 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

290199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 720 · 29 U.S.C. § 721 · 29 U.S.C. § 722 · 29 U.S.C. § 732 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Maine v. Thiboutot · Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn. · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “pervasive policy of tailoring the provision of services to meet the individual needs of each client”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Every person who, under color of [law] subjects or causes to be subjected any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity or other proper proceeding for redress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any goods or services necessary to render an individual with handicaps employable, including ... vocational and other training services.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.