Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 F. App'x 180

United States v. Gray

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2001

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-05-29

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Decided 2001-05-29

PER CURIAM.

¶1 David Furtado Gray seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gray, Nos. CR-95-364-AMD; CA-99-575-AMD (D.Md. Mar. 23, 2000, Feb. 8 & 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/10/fappx/180 · .json · Public domain