¶1OPINION OF THE COURT
¶2Plaintiff landlord filed suit for damages to his premises and back rent. The tenant counterclaimed for return of the security deposit of $175.00.
¶3Upon the evidence presented to this court the tenant stipulated he owed back rent of $300.00. The evidence was insufficient to prove the tenant damaged the premises.
¶4*96Therefore based on Durene v. Alcime, 448 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1984) the court rules as follows:
¶51. Mr. Doverspike is entitled to back rent of $300.00 plus costs of $62.50 for a judgment of $362.50 for which let execution issue.
¶62. Mr. Parham is entitled to a judgment of $175.00 for which let execution issue.
¶7 Although they disagreed as to the amount, both parties stipulated to $175.00.