Kenyon v. Automatic Instrument Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 1989 · most notably Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp. (1963), 116 F. Supp. 102 - Perlman v. Feldmann (1953)
7 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 28 U.S.C. § 654
Relies on Vincennes Steel Corp. v. Miller · Kirby v. United States · Stallo v. Wagner · Swan Carburetor Co. v. Chrysler Corp. · Appliance Inv. v. Western Electric Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Plaintiff objects to the taxation of the cost of the reporter’s transcript in the amount of $112.25. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1920 , permits the taxation as costs of the ‘fees of the court reporter for all or any part of the stenographic transcript necessarily obtained for use in the case.’ The general practice in this and other Federal courts is that the losing party bear the expense of the original transcript which is furnished for the use of the court. See Eickhoff v. Vulcan Iron Works, D.C., 2 F.R.D. 490 ; Gotz v. Universal Products Co., Inc., D.C., 3 F.R.D. 153, 156 . The expense of any additional copies of the transcript obtained by the parties for their own personal use must, of course, be borne by them. Stallo v. Wagner, 2 Cir., 245 F. 636 ; Atwood v. Jaques, C.C., 63 F. 561 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.