Glick v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1985
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bowles v. Safeway Stores, Inc. · E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Byrnes · Grasselli Chemical Co. v. National Aniline & Chemical Co. · Gutowitz v. Pennsylvania R. · Blanc v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Interrogatory No. 5 seeks information as to any tests made by defendant of ‘Tartan,’ ‘to determine whether it was so manufactured as not to be injurious to the skin of humans.’ Defendant claims to make answer thereto would require ‘detailed and technical information and is therefore unduly burdensome.’ The burden is on the party objecting to interrogatories to show that the information called for is ‘privileged, not relevant, or in some other way not the proper subject of an interrogatory.’ Bowles v. Safeway Stores, Inc., D.C., 4 F.R.D. 469 ; Blanc v. Smith, D.C., 3 F.R.D. 182 . We cannot from Interrogatory No. 5 ascertain any privilege, or burden to defendant, by the mere propounding' thereof. If any ‘tests’ as therein referred to were made, defendant would undoubtedly have a record or report of same. If so, the extent of any research it would be required to make would merely be to examine such record or report and respond to said interrogatory accordingly.” Id. at 480.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.