Ward, for plaintiff in error, moved to continue this cause, on the ground of the sickness of R. M. Charlton, Esq. evidenced by the following certificate: “ I hereby certify that in consequence of the injurious effects of repeated attacks of sickness on tire health of Robert M. Charlton, Esq. I have been compelled, as his medical adviser, to recommend an entire abstraction from all professional duty; particularly, attendance on the last May Term of the Superior Court at…
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1965
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
¶2The motion for a continuance of this cause must be overruled. The plaintiff in error is represented before this Court by one of his original counsel in the Court below, who is entirely competent to do both him and his cause entire justice, in our opinion. Motion for continuance refused.