Walker v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 6 Haw. App. 493 - Black v. Black · 7 Haw. App. 102 - Rodrigues v. Rodrigues
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Hawaii’s Family Court of the First Circuit has in personam jurisdiction over Husband and Wife and their interests in parts (2), (3), and (4). The fact that the Texas decree finally adjudicated part (1) does not preclude or inhibit Hawaii’s jurisdiction to subsequently adjudicate pails (2), (3), and (4) when it has in personam jurisdiction over Husband and Wife. It follows that the family court was right when it dismissed Wife’s Complaint for Divorce with respect to part (1), but it was wrong when it dismissed Wife’s Complaint for Divorce with respect to parts (2), (3), and (4).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hsieh v. Sun
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.