Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Ill. App. 3d 39 - Katz v. Katz

10 Ill. App. 3d 39 - Katz v. Katz’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2017

21 state decisions

9019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 25 Ill. 2d 342 - Everett v. Everett · Bergman v. Rhodes · O'Connor v. O'Connor · 14 Ill. 2d 15 - Lemon v. Lemon · Boylan v. Boylan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The plaintiff makes the general argument that defendant has acquired property benefits by the judgment, but such contention is not support [sic] by the record. Defendant received nothing by the judgment that he did not have before the judgment was entered. All property held in joint tenancy was to be divided and held by the parties in tenancy in common.”). 51 . Fla. R. Afp. P. 9.600(c)(2) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.