Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 INDAPP 136 - State v. Oden

State v. Oden’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 1905
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on People v. Whaley · Runnells v. Fletcher · State v. Moore · State v. Stotts · Fuller v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The distinction was clearly made in Massachusetts, where it is held that, ‘to subject an officer to the penalty provided by the statute, it must be proved that the sum alleged to have been extorted was demanded as a fee for some official duty.’ Runnells v. Fletcher, 15 Mass. 525 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.