Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 Johns. 101

Comfort v. Thompson

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1813

New York Supreme Court · decided 1813-01-15

IN ERROR, on certiorari, from a justice’s court. Comfort brought an action of debt against Thompson, before the justice, to recover the penalty under the act to prevent injury by dogs, passed the 24th of March, 1801. (Sess. 24. c. 62.) The plaintiff, in his declaration, stated, that the defendant, after being notified that his dog had chased and killed sheep, had kept him, and not killed him, &c. The cause was tried by a jury.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1879

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1813-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The verdict is, no doubt, clearly against evidence ; hut this being an action for a penalty, there is no new trial granted, in such cases, on the ground of the verdict being contrary to evidence, provided the verdict be for the defendant, and there be no irregularity in the case. (2 Stra. 899. 1238.) There is, at least, as strong reason for applying this rule to such trials in justices’ courts, as in any other.

¶2Judgment affirmed.

/10/johns/101 · .json · Public domain