¶1We have considered this case again, on the facts .appearing on the return to the habeas corpus allowed in Map term, and we see no reason to alter the opinion then expressed. The father, by the pardon, is restored to his parental rights and duties, and is entitled to the custody of his children. It is, therefore, ordered, that Dorcas and David, the two children of John Deming, brought up on the habeas corpus, be delivered over to their father* the said John Deming*
10 Johns. 483
In re Deming
Decided October 15, 1813
New York Supreme Court · decided 1813-10-15
A WHIT of habeas cormts was allowed in this case, in a for-z i • n ini r mer term, (see ante, 232- S. C.) to bring up the mtant children ot Deming. On the return of the writ, it appeared, in addition to the facts before stated, that Deming, at the time (June 1810) he was convicted and sentenced to the state prison for life, had a wife and three children, the eldest of whom was only 5 years old.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2006
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1813-10-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →