10 Kan. App. 2d 39 - Downes v. IBP, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2007
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co. · Demars v. Rickel Manufacturing Corporation · 9 Kan. App. 2d 254 - Stratton v. Garvey International, Inc. · Winkelman v. Boeing Airplane Co. · Hardman v. City of Iola
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ T. As early as 1919 a compensable “accident,” as understood in workers’ compensation law, was defined to include a situation where the physical structure of the worker gives way under the stress of usual labor. Gilliland v. Cement Co., 104 Kan. 771, 777 , 180 Pac. 793 (1919). “ ‘2. In 1949 the court stated, “[i]f injury occurring as the result of a single accident is compensable, surely we will not declare that injury resulting from a dozen or more of the same or similar accidents, all occurring in the course of the employment, is noncompensable.” Winkelman v. Boeing Airplane Co., 166 Kan. 503, 508 , 203 P.2d 171 (1949). See also Demars v. Rickel Manufacturing Cor poration, 223 Kan. 374 , 573 P.2d 1036 (1978).’ Downes v. IBP, Inc., 10 Kan. App. 2d at 41 .” 240 Kan. at 144 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[U]nder Honn , when both hands, arms, feet, or legs are partially disabled, the disability is no longer a scheduled injury under K.S.A. 44-510d, but instead is classified as a permanent partial general disability to the body as a whole under K.S.A. 44-510e.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.