10 Kan. App. 2d 55 - State v. Corrigan’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2007
2 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Texas v. Louisiana · ITT Continental Baking Co. v. William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. · Francis v. United States · Motes v. United States · United States v. Thevis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The federal circuits are divided as to whether the prosecution must make such a showing by clear and convincing evidence (Thevis, 5th Cir.), or merely by a preponderance of the evidence (Balano, 10th Cir.). We need not resolve that question in this case because we believe the evidence supports the trial court’s finding under either standard.” Corrigan, 10 Kan. App. 2d at 59-60 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gettings
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.