10 Ky.
Volume 10 — Kentucky Reports
232 opinions
- 10 Ky. 1Frankfort Bank v. Anderson (1820)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Franklin circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 4Pierson v. Meaux (1820)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 7Phillips v. Green (1820)
<p> On an appeal from ajudg-merit of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 14Collins v. Lane (1820)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Franklin circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 16Phillips v. Tibbats (1820)
<p>After tlte xn'ise in a writ of righ- is joined on the mere right, if deniHndaMt makes de-fan t, final judgment, shall be rendered in bar of the writ-bat a replication is necessary te> constitute a join-der.</p>
- 10 Ky. 17Squires v. Huff (1820)
<p>A tenant at wilt is a tenant from yEar to year, till tinr will ofone or both parties cease— 8*1 tensnt is entitled to six months’ notice to quit.</p>
- 10 Ky. 18Taylor v. Taylor (1820)
<p> On an appeal from á judgment of the Jefferson circuit court </p>
- 10 Ky. 21Bodley v. Hernden (1820)
<p>^ appeai j-rm a decree Qj ⅛ Mason circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 23Fischli v. Dumaresly (1820)
<p>The statute imperative against bat contracts where"the trust is direct —but <’oes trust*; they wilt be de evidenced if'</p>
- 10 Ky. 24Pollard v. M'Clain (1820)
<p> On u viril of error to reverse a judgment of the Henry circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 26Voorhles v. Bridgeford (1820)
<p> On a writ of error to reverst a judgment of the Frank-tin circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 28Roberts v. Sanders (1820)
<p> On an appeal from a judg-rnent of the Scott circuit court </p>
- 10 Ky. 31Farquhar v. Collins (1820)
<p>A plea to lx* good must aver the matter thereofso precisely as to enable the pl’tf io contest it successfully, if in his power</p> <p>An unliqui-dated demand cannot be pleaded as a discount or sfct oil*.</p> <p>Anassump-¡f ¡,⅛⅜ ed to have cru"l debt,</p> <p>A plea in w¡ien t¡J'e 5 matter set forth bars on-notgood.’ ⅛</p>
- 10 Ky. 36Cave's Ex'or v. Calmes (1820)
<p> On a writ of error to revene a, judgment of Ike Woodjord cir-cult court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 39Lee v. Hughs' Ad'mr (1820)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of thi Mason circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 41Moore v. Farrow (1820)
<p>A copy of at> deputy cfer ant with the T¡ ⅛™";. denes! FTP</p> <p>(Viscount21 courts nr ay fteeds for lands tying in rertificate US the deed may be recorded to render such proof or must he ’ m?de within i ed* fbr' re cording deeds.</p> <p>To rer(]er acUcreeobU-patoi-y on *erseei._ vicg 0f ])/0. cess, actual or c.n»*ruc-¿ppéarLceT</p> <p>A power of attorney to convey lands, should be proved or acknowledged and left to be recorded, in tbe same manner as the conveyance itself, and the clerk to take such pro' f or acknowledgement.</p> <p>.. Jor a con* wyanceic be valid against creditors or ⅛) thorn. notice, it must be-proved or £<|⅞ to be recorded within ft °*</p> <p>A vendee tak.ng' pas-seis osi of lands uiuier &i) execuiory contact, an<i expecting’the title to be consummated by vendee» cannot question vend »r*s title, teens, if the tilie has been completed by cLed* vendee t hen holds adversely to vowi-ir* ami w.w set up RuoH>er tiü.íj or in any o; h* ér way question vendor's title.</p> <p>The adverse ggvetTye arsis a good bar to an action jan jgtg for lands,</p>
- 10 Ky. 50Cundiff v. Hail (1820)
<p>On an appeal from the ⅜-laski circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 56Fowke v. Slaughter (1820)
<p>On an appeal.fratn a decree of the Warren circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 58Young v. Murray (1820)
<p>On an appeal fróm ajudgi merit of the Butler cir-mi court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 59Parker v. Owings (1820)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of Ihfi'Fuyelle circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 61M'Clure v. Purcel (1820)
<p>t. ,1he “«⅛-deceased a-* gent should P:irt me parties li-■ tigwn, o ba gainst either.</p> <p>⅛ a traer for the of^'atute'en teredTnto'hyOf 3, in which it 3s agreed shwll^contri-biue ratably, ifooe of tbe piitv retuses bb delays his cor.iribvi.tion, en'lt'ed'to^a specific exe cation,unless tbe delay or necessary his ottn *y-</p> <p>The law ⅜⅛-tWising- be foJ'rai™e d ⅞⅛ 0* 400 -sres,re»tnc-l“d.,he.exer‘ pówe ”to ⅛ g.an; . í a “⅛'⅛ C™ iN,1!3 ‘"‘N VitUI.il, must ⅛⅛ ; n aétuais--- er ;ime* ‘0 'hereon ¾⅛⅛, vvithoir as.signing- his '-hum: m ⅛ requeue*, 'by «¡u»t ⅛ v,l<"</p> <p>,(⅜ Lvi-eenk-ni ⅛ fraud of the 0*°,⅛'¾ chanieilqi.</p>
- 10 Ky. 66Logan's adm'rs v. Troutman's ex'or (1820)
<p>AnadmVs fli-d v/ith U e eounty court, ⅛ primdfade favor'o? the ailm’r. with-óutíhe vouch cordell*'*the eopv^oV ,¡‘3 record is ad-jVnotconclu-sive against tin Be who tics or privies ¡thereto.</p> <p>An , payir g debts óf an inferior detFce’ outstanding' demand of superior ⅜-Pe<? !s ,gui!' ⅛,⅛,&, sucu no; ice need su^ proved hyps" rot.</p> <p>^ hasarigl'üó retain⅜ réa-¿je ¡n ¡,⅛⅛ isteiing the evtn. creditors a» Wdi as in£s,nst butess’</p>
- 10 Ky. 68Woolfolk v. Overton (1820)
<p>A sheriff iamls ¡v‘ power the l~ vey are ali ⅛⅜ can-do.</p> <p>But if the in axe. the poas, ⅛. of hm so, u ⅛ wuivei- of (><- ⅛ purchaser, ⅝ as well as the quikuv '</p>
- 10 Ky. 70Ely v. Thompson (1820)
<p> On a writ of errorta reverse a judgyn't of the Clark circuit c. </p>
- 10 Ky. 76Curtis's Heirs v. Ellis (1820)
<p>TJíe al!j^ -golions of a h**1, are m)t ttíe Vímli^of the fact ai-lodged: ami ⅛,,ree against a ¿ft. alleged n> be answer'oft.u guardian ad</p>
- 10 Ky. 77Gillaspie v. Osburn (1820)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Scott circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 81Smith v. Morrison (1820)
<p>On the return oí ‘⅛ inhabitant’ as oone deft a' pltf may abate as to him, and proceed ag'amst another deft, who has been served with pi'oeess.</p> <p>A sealed promise to pay a debt, merges the simpie tract; and so also does a written sealedb<but*" the mere re-cognitionofa debt and pro-the mode of liquidation the^balance^ (whether ’ sealedomot) is no merger.</p> <p>that portion of the accounts of whictTwas settled by</p> <p>Counsel should not be te&™s,V° fore the jury any P°in‘? tjfe court had decided.</p> <p>On a motion for ix new trial on j ..count of surprise, the affidavit should not only detail the ground on which me surprise is supposed to exist, but should also state the probability that suchevidence will be i-.ro* ducedon the second trial as wiH eff.rct a more favorable result.</p> <p>A new trial on the ground of su -prise should not be grunted if the surpiT e was pro jucM by he .¡aches of the party.</p> <p>to ¾1-*1 cau*e ofaction caS> roi ⅛ urge') il’tiiedeclara-"tív?" notice. b</p>
- 10 Ky. 86Bowman v. Bartlet (1820)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment of the Franklin circuit court,</p>
- 10 Ky. 104Millar v. Field (1820)
<p>The interest of a ness, to ex-timonv"must fae direct ia the issue of tile suit.</p> <p>Ajudg-mens; ⅛⅛ It law ""</p> <p>™ mm amts of the holder of ’?11 equit?b‘e judgment" & thecourtwiti protect ⅜⅛</p> <p>Where the tweaf two or more ees is equal, that shall is prior in date.</p> <p>Anewtri at should setdom begran-'of^v* ¡dence *that " goes to supP®1? Pomts presented"^ the jury on th.e former tmlt</p>
- 10 Ky. 110Hopkins v. Buck (1820)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment of the Henderson circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 112Head v. Head's Adm'rs (1820)
<p>Where rights are merely quitable, the chanceilor erof^ttUrT every fact himself, and tervention 0f a jury or commission-his mind.</p> <p>A view ⅛ not to be granted ^tnw*g^c* meriy ⅛ ⅛-sue in the same pause, newlydiscov^ ered, unless ⅛ evidence ^ ^"of ⅞</p>
- 10 Ky. 123Humble v. Humble (1820)
<p>Parol evi-deuc*- csnnot b«.‘ admitted to vary or extend ¡tie tan-⅜⅛5 ° a</p>
- 10 Ky. 127Pogue v. M'Kee (1820)
<p>,, , , . , , j. On an appeal from a judgment Of Mitsm circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 129Stapp v. Ward (1820)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Scott circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 131Whitley v. Shirley (1820)
<p>xroon a caveat'on a Gr®cn river pS¿eust shew himself c,tal’!y entfc ,!e<^'</p>
- 10 Ky. 131Anderson v. Turner (1820)
<p>When a testator in his will directs lands to be sold, without stating by ■whom, the right to sell and convey devolves upon the executors, a ,d survives to the survivor.</p> <p>Thestatute for the speedy adjusting only to those wh® are actually m of time limited thereby,</p> <p>To constitute a valid declaration in ejectment, the pltf must shew title at the demise0*</p>
- 10 Ky. 135Woolry v. Clay (1820)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Madison circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 137Fowler v. Basket (1820)
<p>n , . . , On a lent of error to reverse ajudg-1nent °f the Nicholas circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 142Trabue v. Tilford (1820)
<p>Oaa writ of error to reverse a judgment of the JIdair county court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 143Irons v. Crist (1820)
<p>rrorta (aj.e a juc¡n-. ment against jj^an*s bef(>^ men^of0^ guardian ad litsm< «orean ¾,⅛⅛⅛⅛,, fore such appointment.</p>
- 10 Ky. 144Shanks v. Christopher (1820)
<p>iiaternte, it is not neces-^ouldf ⅛. rea4 to himtbrender 11 hls ment Df the signature is evidence that ¾ of thecon. tents/</p> <p>To render :vwiU valid, it is not necessary that the testator should subscribe it in the presence of the attest-i"g witnesses.</p>
- 10 Ky. 147Hawkin's Heirs v. King (1820)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Jessamine circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 149Haynes v. Adams (1820)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Casey circuit c'i.</p>
- 10 Ky. 151M'Gowan v. Maccoun (1820)
<p>rh-fts whose-ver ™ Pie,tJ: agamst one, 'h<!’ he fails 's t0 lhe bal" “</p>
- 10 Ky. 153Jewitt v. Marshall (1820)
<p>toInu"sh°'n execution ”& set aside the ed tfernf8 tier, the'purchaser of the lands must ea pjriy.</p>
- 10 Ky. 158Bell v. Morehead (1820)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment of the Logan circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 162Jones v. Wood (1820)
<p> On a, writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Barren circuit] court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 164Atchley v. Latham (1820)
<p>On a traverse in a warrant pff rcible entry and de-tainer, pi* iff may recover according to his proof,tho’ it be less than he demands, and less than th- jury in the couniry gave him, & resiitu ion sl a t go as to the part proved.</p>
- 10 Ky. 166Jones v. Gaither (1820)
<p>An afladavit K new tr.&f, causethe.ri at was had ip the of material should state what the witnesses would plain*’why6*!» co: tinuarxe was not ask-edfor'</p>
- 10 Ky. 167Walker v. Corn (1820)
<p>It is error to alter a road, before the party, thro’ whose land the change will take it, lias been summoned to contest it.</p>
- 10 Ky. 167Vance v. Porter (1820)
<p>icnl n , , On an appeal jrom the Builer clrcmt co1</p>
- 10 Ky. 168Calhoon v. Baird (1820)
<p>On an an appeal from a judgment of the Nelson circuit court. “</p>
- 10 Ky. 168Harrison v. Taylor (1820)
<p>If the liability of a deft, depends on an act to be done simultaneously by the pt’iff, no action lies, unless the act hasbeendone or endeavored to have been done, the subsequent performance, tho’ accepted by deft does not subject deft to a suit on the original contract.</p>
- 10 Ky. 170Crist v. Brashiers (1820)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Bullitt cir-™it court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 172Lampion v. Scott (1820)
<p>It ⅛ error to gm judg-men in favor «henff ae’nst his deputy, because the defcuío^t6* tnust appear that the case eldence*1 °"</p>
- 10 Ky. 173Trabue v. Thomas (1820)
<p> On a icrit of error to reverse a judgment of the Adair circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 174Surlott v. Pratt (1820)
<p>On an appeal from a judgmaxf-of the Lincoln circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 176Young v. Simral (1820)
<p>The record of t he original suitag "inst the principal is no part of the record in the scire fa-cias against the bail, unless made so by plea.</p>
- 10 Ky. 177Griffith v. Depew (1820)
<p>, , , On an appeal from a decree o/ the Uennf circuit court.20</p>
- 10 Ky. 184Bank of Kentucky v. Sanders (1820)
<p> On an appeal from a judg~ ment of the Fayette circuit court </p>
- 10 Ky. 186Comb's Devisees v. Hite's Heirs (1820)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a de.cne of the Washington circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 188Findlay v. Harlan's Heirs (1820)
<p> Qn nn (¡ppeai from a decrit 0f the-Fkmlng eircuU C0UrL </p>
- 10 Ky. 194Pope v. Garret (1820)
<p> On appeal from a decree <f Shelby circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 195Reed's Heirs v. Denwiddie (1820)
<p>On an appeal from a decree the Madison circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 197Parker v. Stephens (1820)
<p>Ob m appeal from a deom of Ifa Pm$elm ctrctfil eoprf,</p>
- 10 Ky. 202Cates v. Loftus (1820)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment *' '. of the Christian circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 208M'Cracken's Heirs v. Beall (1820)
<p>. «ailing >io in-dude an rn. F^owmen. £# ⅛¾. sides of the creek > for ⅛¶⅜⅞⅜.* ed rec;.'.ng»v !ar;.vbsqitar* upper & lower lines m its J^ss* those |⅛ ⅛ he «. qui distant f °™emge "⅛ tiwsldeTfoes par ⅝1 »otha ff'íhát °U"rt ,'hg cl^eic tobe cucos-<n foe «■**- ve^'</p> <p>An entry teade in the name of á dead man is void at common law, but comes under the equity of the act of 1792, which makes grants enure to the benefit of the representatives of a deceased grantee, but the entry, no mat tfer When made, in the name of a dead than, c«n take date only from the passage of that act, and cannot relate back so as to defeat a title acquired before that act</p> <p>Although a cer ifica'eior p .e’ ip ion, the preemp ¡ve li'.n. on lit grantee, yei that rigla ⅛ losi if mi exercised by en trj in the pro per name Within the time limited for entering preemption warrants.</p> <p>A title to lands com-píe d before t >e separation of this state from Virginia, can not b • r{recc-ed by an act of the Kentucky legis-lará.</p>
- 10 Ky. 213Campbell v. Beatty (1820)
<p>On m appeal from 4 de* cree ef the Scott circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 217Smith v. Evans (1821)
<p>A stranger "e°’ m¡tted a de-fcndant in his internáis involved ⅛ C&nVhe comp’t wiU becompehed ‡? aa^ndl'is tj‘e easen¿‘¿ fomUseswrt</p>
- 10 Ky. 219Scrimeger v. Buckhannon (1821)
<p>Oq appeal from a decree of the Lincoln circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 220Mummy v. Johnston (1821)
<p>The right of entry is merely legal and cannotbe affected by the decree of the chancel* lor, miters that decree is, consummated by a conveyance — the chancellor may compel obedience to bis decree, but the mere decree does not alte*-’ the legal position of the party.</p> <p>A question arising” collaterally in the appellate court, and never decided by the court below.cannot be noticed by the aopt-Uatt» court.</p> <p>A conveyance neither proved or ac* knowledg.d and lodged in time with the cferk “ro be recorded/’ does not affect the right of a creditor or purchaser.</p>
- 10 Ky. 222M'Dowell v. Heath's ex'or (1821)
<p>A demaná redCbj*timé at law, will not be aided ⅛" «⅞11’11/"</p> <p>decree, the defendant in error vriilnot made d;f,*dt the C0Uit *iwe.</p>
- 10 Ky. 224Trustees of Lexington v. M'Connell's Heirs (1821)
<p>Jk appeal frrn a de-cret of ⅛ fkyettr cirim.it cawrt.</p>
- 10 Ky. 225Steele's Heirs v. Taylor (1821)
<p>A mistake in the calls of a patent mav be corrected by a reference to the p at £i certificate of survey,” and is evidence of the original position of the coiners, it where they can be ascertained they fiim the boundarytho variant from the description contain ed in the patent.</p>
- 10 Ky. 227King v. Rochester (1821)
<p> On tm appeal from a decree of the Ajercercir-cuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 228Enlaws' executors v. Enlaws (1821)
<p>The slave* of a wife immediately on marriage vests in the husband, and though she may sui v ve him,her right is not revived</p> <p>Slaves devised vest in the d visee, ai ddono* go to t lie ex’or as assets — Vn’e 1 Mar. 74, iron’s ex. vs. Luckey, acc.</p> <p>b^mvte^U) heirs f n s ta ;• rrecisety natu— oí''*6 gmiiiti/.ist' at vilu ’ > ouid d'dTtf their th -v witl^be considev dto be p isessed net eS')ynp«r-chase.</p>
- 10 Ky. 230Chiles v. Corn (1821)
<p>Every available <lefence >n the power of °bllS01’ obligee, before assign-a cur,.ii”e be-C fare notice of assignment, signee.</p>
- 10 Ky. 231Smith v. Frame (1821)
<p>hoidm^lwo adjoining pa-teats interfe-twoother claims,one of which has fcJjfVheVth* er the junior! if the junior patentee en-eider°pateiv tee, and also on one of the ■‘''joining pa-0n the other, it is no dis-tt¡g3matentto not entered on: for to vest or d‘v?3t ““ eral Vareéis by entry, m’lst cneachVa? cel.</p> <p>, , fho Intact it be oil a pomt which vali the com-'planing party, it is no &w trial?r a</p>
- 10 Ky. 234Ogden v. Redman (1821)
<p>lathe com* h,ne> t¡le ofthe teste of P 'ocoss 13 to &■ the "i-e'tu’n d y exc ul-l>c!- or vie* V°r'a'</p>
- 10 Ky. 235Gilchrist v. Williams (1821)
<p>An agree-rnii'a depo-i-tie: stif> modo tho’ tunecí tended as an accommoda-the'/whoac eepts it, is mutual; and tho’the party vour ⅛6 admission was intended,may waive6 the**’ reading of ⅛ his adversary “s®nti*t!e^ul° ject to the ex-cepiions con-tamed m the agreement.</p> <p>If a defend, ant’s account is barred by the statute of limitations, it cannot be used as a setoff.</p>
- 10 Ky. 237Pursley v. Davidge (1821)
<p>A chancery bt'*regularly died tilt the term next thatat which the answers *r>- noitd of record.</p>
- 10 Ky. 239Taylor v. Eubanks (1821)
<p>The mere cir cumstance of a pare,nt be; time e mates an ad-not^r ,⅛ ⅛* reidor .he jJ’H void, 't crediiV Jut vulates such s ftl</p> <p>Tromtbefa-be inl'rrr’Jan “ten- to de-[r‘4uJ> but ⅛, máyU'b* repelled by d°'ln*el^,heVu be left to the jury. '</p> <p>, Ofa^lave/ho accompanied bypossession in the donee against the creditors of the donor or jbr"» valuable consid’ration until the do-wi 8hnn«!!.«V gionSyeará.</p> <p>A Creditor under a usu* rious contract is not such a creditor as wi it be peimitted to question the title of such dqnea.</p>
- 10 Ky. 244Lucas v. Mitchell (1821)
<p>A purefca-no-not be protected.</p> <p>The the renedv from ign a verbal |aHd,a<blit°it doestiotixtin-gms the mo-it is an av;.i!able defence in suits brn’t parol con-irá^.</p> <p>a bill ⅛ chancerydis-™!*sed 'iP014 should bV* dismissedpe-remptoniy, outprcjudice</p> <p>If an ad-vatice be wimoui the assent of ano-advn’nce'niay enure to the benefit ol that other, yet the cingshall'not recover it</p> <p>ft necessarily”' made a deft. shall recover his cósis.</p>
- 10 Ky. 247Lewis' Heirs v. Ringo (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse ajudg-f rnent of the Greenup circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 249Fowler v. Trustees of Lexington (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 252Craig v. Clarke (1821)
<p>Notice in ejectment is In the nature of process, & ednn<by 6 any statement of the person «.t’vincr * P serving the' declaration, or by the defendants ap-Sceptfn&un less they at-so enter into ruta common</p>
- 10 Ky. 253Porter's Heirs v. Robinson (1821)
<p>made "J-der a decree thu’ "¡⅛1⅛⅛0⅛ expressed.</p> <p>Tho’inf.nt have 'had a guardian to defend, the thernlsTaiid ’ till reversed, it is one of wide!) are3»«¿ ail judicial ^iusUnftnts are'1S eWctoife only.</p> <p>„Tbeholder c,mty cannot, in a court of question a le-galestate,</p> <p>If a leg's! title under a d cree be made to a bo. no, fide purchaser, and the decree under which the sale was made be ra» versed, I he original holder may be restored to his equity, biit the legal <$- tate is not thereby defeated: if the legal title can, in any case, be impeached, ’ it must be in e* quity, though tt.e party whose prop, erty has bien sold mv der a devee has his remedy ."gainst the parly at whose suit the decree W:.s c'.tsip.</p> <p>An estate in dower partakes of the estafefoi' the husbaml, if his estate ble^henT'can be no more & therefore can her Pr°ii!ist *M’,S’of on- holding ⅛⅛⅛1* es~</p> <p>A man con* vejing a ti tc under a decree to lands for which he had beiore given a b >ed with special warran y, is liable on h is warranty to neither party & therefore is a competent witness</p> <p>Abstract Questions should never be r-jjarded by the court</p> <p>The ■possession rifa widow i^mamiirg in the mansion house til her do wer is slotted is con shunt with the possession of the Coirs and in an ejectment bro’t against her they have a right to defend.</p>
- 10 Ky. 259M'Calla v. Rigg (1821)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse « judgment of the Fayette ar-court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 260Hume v. Scott (1821)
<p> On a writ cf error tore? verse, a judgment of the Bourbon circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 262Noble v. Bank of Kentucky (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment oj the Fay-ett$ circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 266Aspinwall v. Chase (1821)
<p> On appeal/ from a jvdg-merit of the Fayette circuit court </p>
- 10 Ky. 268Kelly v. Keizer (1821)
<p>On a writ of error to re~ verse a judgment of the Fayette circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 268M'Kinny v. Watts (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Clarke circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 276Burton v. Brashear (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Hardin circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 280Beeler's Heirs v. Bullitt's Heirs (1821)
<p> On an appeal from d decree of the Jefferson circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 284Norton v. Allen (1821)
<p>A note for not sealed, is a specialty & be'declared npoa.</p>
- 10 Ky. 285Bullock v. Beemis (1821)
<p>n . , , , On an appeal from a decree of the Yelson circuit court 1 ^ * ”*</p>
- 10 Ky. 288Craddock v. Shirly (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Barren cir<-cuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 289Moseby's Adm'r v. Corbin's Adm'r (1821)
<p>A testator devising a slave “to A fot life, and if she should die without issue, then the slave and her increase to return to his estate after the death of her husband,” means a dying without issue living at her death, and not an indefinite failure of issue; that this was the intent of the testator is to be inferred from the implied bequest in favor of the issue of A if she had any at the time of her death, and the implied intent that if any such issue existed at her death, they should take by purchase and not by descent from her.</p> <p>sue is sometimes taken as a term of limitation, but whether The term ⅛--a ration or of purchase be tis-theTntent^of the testator, gather-test "of the with here the ¡íj¿u¿stAfur shews he meant she not tafe 0* itimee, and tbe b< quest i,° life,proves he intended the no greater estate;whereas lfíhéterm ken^s a*word of limitation, the slave, con-testator, would ia-f**"'1* Jes* hand</p>
- 10 Ky. 292Frankfort Bank v. Hunter (1821)
<p> On an appealfrom a judgment of the Franklin circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 293Morgan v. Currie (1821)
<p>On a writ of error lo reverse a decree oj </« Boone circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 296Cammack v. Macy (1821)
<p>A forcible b^detaíner" al.e distinct offences, yet ™.ay he warrant&th’ jury in the country, may ^ and riot ofth5 other; on a r^jnly ,,f which*<i*ft is found guil-inr lssue</p> <p>tutea*fo^c⅛1* d’tam’r there must be ac-tu.*j /oroe hand, unless the parties s a,l<} ln ll’e relation ot landlord and tenant,</p>
- 10 Ky. 298Thomas' v. Trustees of Harrodsburg (1821)
<p>^ price 0f )ou so d by the trustees of a t¡fm (uniess some mema-randum in t4s or some person autho ns’dbyth’m) canivtbe co-ercecj tho’a record of the 0fthe trust’s.</p> <p>To venderá parties must be mutually</p>
- 10 Ky. 299Hudnut v. Bullock (1821)
<p>A contract miibter' atid an infant prentice is ble nor'fs a contrac; by which the master setts apprentice his time to auuitappren" tice who has bound him-scil chthecon" tract.</p>
- 10 Ky. 302Jones v. Prewit (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Madison circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 304Applegate v. M'Clung's Heirs (1821)
<p>The declarations of a party are i» the general inadmissible in. his own favor, and al-wayssowhere the tacts are susceptible of proof by disinterested, testimony</p> <p>A bill of exceptions o* mitt mg to state what tiie judgra’nt of the circuit court was, cannot be noticed by the appel, court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 305Allen v. Pryor (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment oj the Jefferson circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 308Smith v. Smit's Ex'ors (1821)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment of Henderson county court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 309Jackson v. Jeffries (1821)
<p>A will made and rerorued in Y'.r^'mia, dir cti’-g the e\’»rs lo sell lands in Kentucky, hut liever recoi d-ed in Kentucky, jet the county court where the lands he, on the death ot the ex’ors, niay grant letters testamentary with the wül an-ees d before recording the wll Such act is ce tain ly an irregular ex-rcise of jurisdiction, but will not avo d he letters until reversed.</p>
- 10 Ky. 311Ward v. Trimble (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a judg-merit oj the Greenup circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 312Mitchell v. Owings (1821)
<p>On an appeal from a decree of the Bourbon circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 317Samuel v. Brite (1821)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Henry circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 317Gore v. Marshall (1820)
<p>The statute oflimitat ions of ltiG9 does not run a-g-ainsi a feme covert.</p> <p>The statute of limítate ns of 11-09 is no bar untes» the tenant has been sevin year in possession be-, for.- stilt brought</p> <p>A feme covert is allowed 7 years after discover-ture to sue for land*-</p>
- 10 Ky. 320Givens v. Pollard (1821)
<p>A new ferry cannoi be established a* cross the Ohio within a mi¡e of a former terry, un less it be in a town, or unless between the two there intervenes an impassable creek, or it be opposite to a ferry established on the other shore.</p> <p>Notice of an application for a ferry is only ,e-C'-ssarj to be uiv’nto'hose who have s- ' ablished ferries within a mile.</p> <p>^Application may be made by an attor-neyatlaw, as tor’* Tn^e-t 1 y *</p> <p>Actual pos-lands*0i °f absence of all other proof, will justify the establish-mentofafer-ry.</p>
- 10 Ky. 322Birney v. Hann (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Mercer circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 328Payne v. Taylor (1821)
<p>A . tho’ neoesst ry for family PS8> is n?1 ányUpf the prohibitions leare .*• but'a should never f?‘Te leave *°?s the conse-quenye, un- ™ ®?ses necessity!011*</p>
- 10 Ky. 330Finley v. Hayden (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to Hurst a judgment of the Christian circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 331Carrine v. Westerfield (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Mercer circuit court </p>
- 10 Ky. 334Miller v. Long (1821)
<p>The 0f ¡tlana vendor when he makes no misrepreséh-ta» ion to vhe vendee, but j^nature* & extent of Ms claim furnish ^."thfinte^ p’sition ofth' chancell’r af-tilen|^ee<^ tho’ before lhe, ac“P** °vendee may refuse to !>R1'fecf tilB contla”t'</p> <p>if a pin-chaseis made 8s convey’nce receiv’d from 8 vendor having no title,& th’ vendee be evicted, his remedy is at law, on the covenants contained iii the deed, & not in chancery to rescind tii’con-tract ,</p>
- 10 Ky. 336Hurt v. Miller (1821)
<p>On an appeal from a judg- . ment of the Green circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 338Higgs v. Smith (1821)
<p>If a bond is given for the payment^ of euriTthecan-eelment of a fraudulent ^ afterthe ligo^knewof the fraud, tL’ beimpeach’d —the parties have a right t0¡se-Cf'ntheir dispute.</p>
- 10 Ky. 339Hawkins v. Com'th. for Ward (1821)
<p>In a suit bonVttM-eal pkint’ffmust hyve a legal right to sue, & fiot ⅞ nscr© equity.</p>
- 10 Ky. 340Chiles v. Stephens (1821)
<p>In warrants of forcible entry and de-tainer, the right of entry is not in issue; nothing but the actual possession can be tried, and it is immaterial how that possession was gained.</p> <p>jp the fen ant holds over.th*» land-hervir * of t e enmt, warrant.' ⅜</p> <p>A ,ossess mn gainedby disseisen.wiil ⅛1 jpevent from main”1" taining lús warrant ag’st entry, but whoenterson wkluHitTiiT assent.</p> <p>A general power amho-gent “to finish alt the setiFfTbesi ness”’auiiio-10 rises ti e a-gint to take fanrls,SSto °f which the principal has ’name’of principa!.</p> <p>There may be a possession in fact by a person not f.'Ct upon the land.</p> <p>, Whether the warrant was in fact possessed, ⅛ ^fch should be left to the' jury.</p> <p>rant and not i/anentr/in-to a part Whether the entry of a landlord into a part of the leased premises, but not in contest in the war-which wa enify ⅛ to the whole, mu®1 depend on the intention with which the entry was made, and must be left to the jury-</p>
- 10 Ky. 350Malone v. Samuel (1821)
<p>It is correct to allow a sheriff to amend his return even at a subsequent term, and the amendment will relate to the proper return day.</p>
- 10 Ky. 351Jenkins v. Bush (1821)
<p>A bond given to one man, but re* ally for the use and benefit of another, is subject' to &-y equity which may exist betwee n the obligor and peiso/Y for \vhos.‘ hem-fit fíje bond is taken,.</p>
- 10 Ky. 352Jones v. Benj'n. South's ad'mr (1821)
<p>The a^t increasing magistrates* jurisdiction, do¿s not diminish the po arers of the chancellor,or confer npon justices of the peace a power to decide on equitable deten-cea.</p> <p>Where a defence is purely 'eg*l, and application is made to the chancellor for re? lief because of *rick in procuringthe judgm’t, that trick musí be made out" very plainly to justify an interference.</p>
- 10 Ky. 353Hite v. Taylor (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Green circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 354Lowe v. M'Donald (1821)
<p>Oft a breach of covenant to convey lands with special warranty, the price given is the criterion of 'damages: if that is not shewn, but the value of the land at the sale is shewn, the jury may infer the value was given Ik find so.</p>
- 10 Ky. 355Walker v. Commonwealth (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgpient of the county court of Floyd. </p>
- 10 Ky. 356Cowan v. Glover (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse an order of the Jefferson county court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 358Strode v. Ross (1820)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse » judgment of the Fleming circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 359M'Gowan v. Cassidy (1820)
<p>A settle-stable andhis predecessor, ment'overW ⅛ acting' ' constable of ,'r'oneJ ,001* nume Qf ano. ther,does not discharge 'former0 com stable had re-ceiPte:i the note.</p>
- 10 Ky. 360Biggs v. M'Ilvain's ex'x (1820)
<p>If the representative ofo decedent ÍU pendens appears & goes on to trial without a sci. fa it is too late after verdict for the adversary to object the want of a sci. fa.</p> <p>A bill ©f exceptions allowed and signed by the judge in vacation, tho* copied into the record, is no part thereof, asid cannot be noticed.</p>
- 10 Ky. 360Moore's Heirs v. Fauntleroy (1820)
<p> On a toril of error to reverse a decree of the Mercer circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 365Trotter v. Cassady (1820)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Fleming circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 367Grimes v. March (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Clarke circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 368Dumaresly v. Fishly (1820)
<p>A marriage cei.ebra,'’‘l ⅛* must be test* ed by the ^ws °f</p> <p>A marriage celebrated, but not ac-provision of he staiute the^xdem li ziitionofmlt" venheless tute isdlrec-tory to the functionaries address'd "elf to the parths</p> <p>A mam e ls a civil core tract amt demands only the requisites orar>iiiiy5uu-lingness, and the act of con-tractmp ^ the English law the con-trcct should facie ecclemne</p> <p>a marriage de ficto, <o’ noide jure,ia Kent's "as*it relatest >per* s°nai matters torts‘</p> <p>The conse quenc.es of declaring a . tvr,l'i iage d - facta void V" U/d t e plor.tb.e to society.</p> <p>Tho* cohabitation is necessary to render a marriage valid when entered into per ver-ba de futuro, h is not so when .the tnarri; ge was entered into per verba de presentí.</p>
- 10 Ky. 378Lynn's Heirs v. Calk (1820)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment of tkg Montgomery circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 379Smith v. Hornback (1820)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Bourbon cir-mit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 380Brown v. Hobson (1821)
<p>Awdlgiv-certain^peiv sons therein named,tosell 'fnris ,lleir tt personal trust,and thot thesarne pf,r‘ namtdex’ors yet on their, ¿“JJ8 tor w¡íh Jie will annexed, has no power me^ust^the power dies with the trus-no^be^riTiv-ed.</p> <p>A power (t0 executors to be executed '^°ele’</p> <p>If all four of the corners of a four sided survey be m .de.but l he ctofeitii^ line lef> open, the course must be so varied as ; o strike fee corners.</p>
- 10 Ky. 383Jarman v. Howard (1820)
<p>An instruction as in case of a nonsu t can rightfully be given only where a pl’tf wholly fails to support his de-mandas laid: a partial failure does rot justify sued instruction</p> <p>A parol promise or promise implied fcy law, is not assignable,— and if such promise be made to three and one trails fers his interest to (lie other two, til o’ the deft. with complete knowledge of the fací, promise to pay the two, >et all three must join in the action.</p> <p>to pay to the two, might ^ ,S°od> d* valid etntider tion, as forbearance, tion ,r> the name of the should be based onsuch not on ^end riginalprom* ⅛ and the leged and proven.</p>
- 10 Ky. 385Nicholas' Heirs v. Jones (1821)
<p>On a covenant of tends sold & conveyed by executorsun-given in° the wilt, theh’rs cannot be .madeiiable.</p> <p>» covenant made by an t0 p^extentof ⅛ ob-on 8"“ -£er®°!J¡ and °n a prayer ex’ór fails to answer, it is asset™anda pna cmfe.so</p> <p>asking- relief and a oiscov-eHor disccv-ery gives <he chancellor jv|;is.<llcilon» proper for chancery interference, .Vscovery ** brings with if ’he «gbt <⅜ re ie ’</p>
- 10 Ky. 388Howe v. Logwood (1821)
<p>⅛ imner-fact contract h>r lands, deft" comoie^ (⅛ <>»'contingencies 'v!l cl> n^'er not entitle the occupant proyemeiusi" ¡ e mus. be considered as ⅛, prevements "*«le for bis „T"tion Clind must súrreiS her on ;he</p>
- 10 Ky. 390Brown v. Heard (1821)
<p> On a writ of (trot to reverse a' dvcrpp ef the Garrard circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 392Smith v. Hornback (1821)
<p>AVer the mise laid in a declaration in ejectment is expired.no habere facias can issue,tho* the execution may have been suspended ny injunction.</p> <p>' The verity of a sheriff’s return cannot be collaterally questioned by p-,rnl, iti»* ii may be ques'ion- d \v 'ere it is directly in issue.</p>
- 10 Ky. 394Steele's Heirs v. Logan (1821)
<p>~ , & , On an appeal from a judgment# Enjefte-efrctiM £mrt-</p>
- 10 Ky. 398Carrico v. Lilly (1821)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse Vo judgment of the J\'eLon circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 399Monroe v. Castleman (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 400Madox v. M'Quean (1821)
<p>wh^'h'foTns a component part of a ne-gociatmnwill tlCS'lj tllllSSS all the rri-tings are ex-delivered111</p> <p>An unrea-onthe par t of the person praying a specific execution.to perform his part of an agree-¡hice’The m" chancellor to withhold his ®‘d.</p>
- 10 Ky. 403Johnston v. Farmers' & Mechanics' Bnk. (1821)
<p> On writ of error to reverse a judgH. °jFayettec.c. </p>
- 10 Ky. 405Oldham v. Faris (1821)
<p>Ón a writ of error lo reversé a d/eeree oj the Knox cult court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 407Holder's Heirs v. Commonwealth (1821)
<p>Where ⅞11⅝-«gainst* tile*1 ancestor, the heir, at com-",0"¡^' 'yss thí¡’ he was liable to suit ont.the.°b.li; wss°express^ fj bound,and if he piead faded5,to con-less «seis, the j idsm’t. gainst ⅛*' individually</p> <p>By tbesta-tute of «Vest-minster, an elegit was given to ex-land ^a'V' a sci fa would lie against the heir, bui ’proutiTlteT gainst Inm as terter ant,not</p> <p>of Virginia, 17>-7, ail the public°default er & his ser unties,are jubjecttocx-they are lía-hie in the hands of the same propow tion, bu! ii is ns corten.ml, Itiir. **.'</p> <p>Tj,eaet ¾ 17⅜⅜ 81⅛.’ jecimy ⅛⅛ 10 emends the" 'Ability too® pt'ffpTunite 'he heir with theexecuiorj di'thts' rct must be a-g»;nsthim as tmenm?</p> <p>But as the of 1798 ;n ro<lures, *■ [^mustTe^ strictly pur-to S where he was not be-fofe liable, • Í^T^st'^him- and tbe ert &c must be proceeded a-g^nst singly Itawe betora tbeibtitu/</p> <p>/Vhereasci & is brought mentJagaLit s'everal to re T®re «gainst the defendants must be made defts. in the sci. fa-</p>
- 10 Ky. 410Ridgway v. Collins (1821)
<p>On an appeal from » decree of the Clark Circuit Court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 412Slaughter v. Barnes (1821)
<p>On a writ of error to re-versé a judgment of tUe Breckinridge cir. court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 414Morton v. Long (1821)
<p>⅞> issut ject to *he decree be'made'a1 party, nor be served with a the</p> <p>-«A rwVlTW against a stranger does “ ’</p>
- 10 Ky. 417Burch v. Young (1821)
<p>fceva/¡¿hTrast respond to very breach "he Í tion. e° ara'</p> <p>If a vendor si the time of title "to the land, and defends un-of tenderle roust shew that he liad title*"or the is bad</p> <p>When there ls no fixed which a* conveyance is to be made,ven-seek theren-dee if he is within the make'or^teit. 4er the deed,</p> <p>a vendor, rs-lying «» the deTmust make» prof-ert of the, deed,</p>
- 10 Ky. 419Lear v. Yarnel (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Bourbon circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 422Bank of the U. S. v. Norton (1821)
<p>The supreme court of the union has a right on atl questions arising under the constitution or any statute of the U. States té decide : they possess appellate jurisdiction from the state courts on ttiose questions, and the state courts aré bon- d by tltei'-or.- ion. 2 Mar .99 ae£t</p> <p>The Bank of‘heUnired States is au-purchase the notes ef indi, viduals.</p>
- 10 Ky. 429Tuggle v. Adams (1821)
<p>A note dis-fcounied m as- ⅛> sumes the di . G-í) i«t'a fOivisjn o;H, bu íhe con-sidera. ioti lD-ty be con-té . d ba-twi*-.' che innoe.iiuie p»rhes, and /\i' noie made by th*- p*ynr, and loaned fot' the ac-commodation of the , the cannot '3&$$htain an action there-0⅞ in his own name, if it has been ne¿ gotiated the bank ¿¡one can maintain the suit against payor</p> <p>After a note has been negotiated the co-sideration thereof/. \yh 1st the property of the bunk.cuti-not be quesr tioned by tho. payor.</p> <p>Tbo* . ⅛¾" jj| k' recoid may copy into it tb®. note oij mfly ⅛ ⅛* - brought ⅜⅛ tbe endorse-^"the'cdurt cannot notice c\,tber unless made^pwt ofthe record oyer, &c. buí ,ot! averi ment m a pjea that th& note is the ■ tija pl’fU' wilt be attended to^& p!e ptainnff will be pre-cilu,.eri fren» theTactionta tisownnsnife A msn holding a note made -o himself' ’3 prima jfac a e i-tlenee that lie is die owner and lie may strike oui the endorsements, but this does not prevent the payor from shewing’ that the note is really the property of one of the endorsers.</p>
- 10 Ky. 432Outon v. Rodes (1821)
<p>^ efJ ,-oncer thes.de or lating- to die admioisna-I!011 jl'*J ¡1Cr' ire V01 in equity.</p> <p>Whether tin wiiutdVeli-vf on the prayer ot ¡ e office'"Is 1,6 doubtfui but no doubt lb'/u^tniue ef' dilation u jjIfc ch icing the benefit of it.</p>
- 10 Ky. 434Carlysle v. Long (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a jydgment of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 435Banks v. Mays (1821)
<p>A conside-^ocTo^ahr ab!e is^ssen-tialtoihera-liduy of a the^hancel-lor will never decree speci</p>
- 10 Ky. 443Fowler v. Lewis (1821)
<p>On an apppeal from a detree of the Greenup circuit court^</p>
- 10 Ky. 446Breckenridge's adm'rs v. Lee's executors (1821)
<p>Jlppeal from « ji-.a'nt oj tii£ Fm/tecAr <owt.</p>
- 10 Ky. 452Magowen v. Hay (1821)
<p> On a icrit of error to reverse a jud'nt. of the Logan circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 454Owings v. Ulory (1821)
<p>Tresspass may be maintained nl) 20 years possession against a person having no title, tho’ the pl’ff cannot de-diitrce a title from the comaioo’ith.</p> <p>If two pa-tentees divide tretract by actual suney, and one of them sells & giv< s possession to the vendee, who retains the possession for SO years, the jury may fairly infer that there were deeds of parti lion executed.</p> <p>the jury,' in tl,e*r daraa_ confined to”1 the value of ‘lle property them according to aggra-cum'st'n-es n0P Vdf the verdict be cause" th-d»' ¿e“' high, unless J^ey are so pfove*the°ju-ry to have been mfluen-Iu trespass tivesT ced by improper mo-</p>
- 10 Ky. 456Commonwealth v. Mason (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Casey circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 457Barlow v. Wilet (1821)
<p>An infant m* w ⅛ otllPrs ami be joint, “j™" '”n.13" der the plea of infancy, it ,n£j ⅛ other, should be acquitted,</p> <p>*f''e ven.^e of an article bta,es it l0 be only of a cer-it ;⅜ worth more, tiiisfo caust: f°r Contra - for the vendor ⅛ hound to of the arilcle sold,</p> <p>Where an instrument rle elat' d on is in) estched, on tile score of fruu d, the plea should set forth the facts in Which the fraud is supposed to ex-js', or the plea would be bad on demurrer, but if the plai’tff replies he Waives the defec- and permits the &;f ndant to prove any fraud he can</p> <p>Suits in other -®“ ⅜0 shewíiaud m the suit ^)fenf'r? q.!*«y of may be t'etedon to ⅛*1" ffrauded, but »* must-be</p>
- 10 Ky. 462Simpson v. Shannon's heirs (1821)
<p>On a joint sever'd me infancy’ or coveriure of one or more tiff’s lessors, does not pre-VteoiTm'ta' tfons fronT" running — in such a de-lessors11 musd labor under some of the described*in the statute, and all must lu-ve none can ’</p> <p>^ deseeat .tie (leftshad hi*?» five yrs. piaintfs* right of entry '^⅛53 tfle *eivesjjad been in pos-</p>
- 10 Ky. 463Chiles v. Dedman (1821)
<p>A pltfV claiming a lot bv deed .teesofatown-'*^ is nared ' twenty unhs^df'oc icupant en to the ?nSte?S ^</p> <p>Evidence pltif be produced ll^deferd aarondts' to shew it, the p!tf cann ege gur-prise.</p>
- 10 Ky. 465Olds v. Com'lth (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse an order of the Jessamine circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 468Humble's heirs v. Hinkson's heirs (1821)
<p>A purchase*, of lands, by bond> one having n& titls, may resort, after of^tfme^ei36 ihe.no law, for cooipen-*a*int ’ forla d?ssoiution 8 of the con-ri^diet^'n concurrent1*</p> <p>deIf ltie,yen* to^qony for a oncelment of the cont’ct iraf Utnds° eorni’np by descent to theven'torls not subject, in his han.is, *’/has111®! 6 neV tho’Tli'e b’r. be bound m the bond, nombro’"1 on the bond but for the pur-cing the par ties* in ttatn quoy and because the lands of the obligo!* eou’d not be subjected (from the date of the contract) so neither can the)' he in the hands of the L’r unless s’l be bo’c on the bond.</p> <p>sett‘nfi tract for the sale of lands wnere pos-‘l0 vendee, tiie parties she’d ^1” ,„⅛ the p isses-«ion restored t|,e operation the decree t!le ev;cte<i id:r a bona recovery,</p> <p>When per-assets the heirs,the personal" es-he</p>
- 10 Ky. 472Deatly's heirs v. Murphy (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Nicholas circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 480Samuel v. Minter (1821)
<p>To reverse a decree of the Jes-samne “““ cmrL;</p>
- 10 Ky. 483M'Alexander v. Lee (1821)
<p>On a writ of error to reverse. o decree of the Lincoln cir-mit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 485Clay v. Hopkins (1821)
<p>An agent, istias ^ fir compensati’n ?“ he has no Hen on the lands -ias agency.0</p> <p>In general a a^d'iscrefon ov’r t e costs of a suit.</p> <p>⅝ A bill of bXCf6citizen of this state, onanoth’r ci-e*™te* on protesi, does not decent! ^ama-ges.</p> <p>a resort t* the reason of a statute, ts ^r'nS a. case w-1 hin i i s purview, can only be had. whe!’e ‘here ¡tyof-xpression, no room ,s leH fr!r wTer^tbe0*1 language is piaba,</p>
- 10 Ky. 489Vance v. Wier (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a decree of the Fayette circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 490Hutcheson v. Ross (1821)
<p> On a writ of error to reverse a judgmn't of the Bourbon circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 491Taylor v. Chapline (1821)
<p>tion° resting on rúan* - ef fact, dehors *^e re<^1,ecjitl unless the facts are set for'h in the opm'cn of the court be.ow sumedu/Te correct.</p>
- 10 Ky. 492Schooler v. Ashurst (1821)
<p>A deft holding1 the ¿f-firmtvive of the is9iK ,fail-"•gtO appear, judgment by d fnj(. is prr-pcrit rtn-<le«ed. apú; &t him</p> <p>A defeat’s n«v.i.e in a , note spelt, as it is vulgarly pronounced, is no misno*.</p>
- 10 Ky. 492Bank of Kentucky v. Lacy (1821)
<p>In motions to quash forthcoming bonds,all the obligorsmust he parties.</p>
- 10 Ky. 493Winney v. Cartricht (1821)
<p>Bv the act of 1800, emancipation may be affected bv an instrument in writing, made by a master of eighteen years or upwards, and signed without a seal ap-pendant ; not so bv the act of 1782 and 179 >; those sta*utes re-. quire a seal and recording</p> <p>If the letter of emancipation is lost, its contents may be proved by evidence a&-unde></p> <p>?,ct emancipation need not he recorded ex-perpetuity to the evidence</p> <p>In the event of a lo-s of a letter o¡ emancipation eourt°shoidd noi receive evidence of its contents theP person* claiming the benefit of the sboubfresort to a bill in equity, with proper pm-</p>
- 10 Ky. 498Briscoe v. Briscoe (1821)
<p>ment for'cost alone,</p>
- 10 Ky. 499Burton v. Emerine (1821)
<p>On an appeal from ajudg-mentof the Madison cir-wit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 501Taylor v. Alexander (1821)
<p>A survey by’e' the aut >ority of the owner, ansi any subí sequent sur-vo¡¿</p> <p>^ ren4sj ?Hch sub¡.e. quent survey available, the both surveys cover the same lsnd'</p>
- 10 Ky. 502Singleton's h'rs v. Lewis's h'rs (1821)
<p> On tin appeal from a judgment of the FayetU CÍrCUÜ Cmrt' </p>
- 10 Ky. 503Alexander v. Leatch (1821)
<p>W|)ere nr> piea ⅛ entered, no ver-fos-the ctefond’e.</p>
- 10 Ky. 504Anderson v. York (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Ma~ son circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 504Curry v. Fowler (1821)
<p>A dee.-l matls b> the sheriff for tanas snid tor taxes in the life of the valKHhí ’ éx8 emted ¡.iter his death '</p> <p>The com-bas'T^r'e tud Uen^on lands for tax-*“s-</p>
- 10 Ky. 505Bank of Frankfort v. Markley (1821)
<p>Notice of the protest oí a note, negotiated in bank, is good if given toe da- after t e protest, tho* the parties may reside in the same town where the bank is located.</p>
- 10 Ky. 505May's h'rs v. Slaughter (1821)
<p>On on appeal from a judgment of the Nelson circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 515Hansford v. Barbour (1821)
<p>„/» sheriff’s’sale, is not per se, ^a'^nce</p> <p>jj0 person hasarightto ^np^mtthat t;onai are infringed when lJíe thtngs°corn-plained of has befn su-ovra acts and has involved o-aa“® ma.</p>
- 10 Ky. 517Trabue v. Kellar (1821)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment of. the Bourbon circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 519Walton v. Fretwell (1821)
<p>n , On an appeal from the Chrislian circuit courL</p>
- 10 Ky. 521Reed v. Williams (1821)
<p>resfitut'i’ifbe executed and afterwards quas’ied, affected, she pt’ff .may ⅛-^¡t oftesti lotion tho’ than a the iuim’nt</p> <p>Where an abort ive exe cutior; has issued, the - pl’ff may sue out another, without a sci fa tho* more than a year has passed since the judgment.</p>
- 10 Ky. 522Graham v. Price (1821)
<p>A variance between a judgment & execution, in an immat’rial point, will nor vitiite, it is sufficient if the conformity is sufficiently intimate to shew the execution issued on the judgment.</p>
- 10 Ky. 524M'Cracken v. Woodfork (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment oj the Hardin circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 526Millar v. Campbell (1821)
<p>On an appealfrom ajudg* ment of the Jefferson cir- «*& court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 527Smith v. Rowzee (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a judgment of the Henry circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 532Hord v. Trimble (1821)
<p>If an injunction lit awarded to a stranperstay-ir g an execution ag’nst the original debtor, & the bond oniy binds the stranger to pay a!) damages & costs on the dissolution, die ot liger is not bound I i the Original dtbt</p> <p>Alt’no’ the breaches in a declaration need not be assigoed m the veiy covernrr vet they musa be so assigned as to s-.e* a biea.v.h or the covenant,</p>
- 10 Ky. 535Todd v. Laughlin's heirs (1821)
<p>ft ⅛ parties who hava notan-beffiTterved procer.</p> <p>No can be dered in fa p°,J "attempt inp to set an < ntry, un alleg-sohe'1 entry tobe valid one avers the dentity and notoriety the objects called for.</p>
- 10 Ky. 536Chambers v. Thomas (1821)
<p> Oii an appeal from a judgment of the ¿Montgomery circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 539Rearden v. Searcy's Heirs (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Woodford circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 545Brooks v. Clay (1821)
<p>After issue joined ⅛ e-jectment, no objection to form can prevail.</p> <p>A possession of more than twenty years, when taken before the survey or pa^ tent, is limited by the closet</p> <p>in^fronTthe bar and turning no disc?’. ar6d RUhéTend the term and a venire de er ° 13 Pr°P"</p> <p>An informa! chanle of 3 venue does not operate a anoe.'ltmU"</p> <p>⅛⅛,, a of 8Rmo' a in abate-at¡JLei,^sílgUl¡¡| gPS,eCOn-yenienthour,</p> <p>It ⅛ t es> sential to the validity of a ⅛^"patentee sho’ld accept it is also v.allf un<^sr seat.</p> <p>A copy of aconveyance on he toss of original</p> <p>An American citizen removing'to the domin-anw hoidhg or sel!ins lands</p> <p>Hearsay evidence, except as to pedigree, or the declarations of a deceased parent as to the age of a child, is inadmissable and its reception will not be cured by the subsequent produc tion of competent evidence to the ssme fact.</p>
- 10 Ky. 551Stair v. Pickett's heirs (1821)
<p>Irl ejeetm’t ⅜⅛, andino-tice must be noticed on term^ft ⅛ returnable,or it is discon-tmued, -and at a quent term ^«^henRo* ted on record at the proper* ,erm tlle su,t ^^service notice</p>
- 10 Ky. 552Sebree v. Clay (1821)
<p>Qna error {o nverse ⅞ judg-nient of the Fayette circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 554Allen v. Beal's heirs (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Campbell circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 556Gray v. Gorin (1821)
<p>the one traversingtiie ⅛⅜ otherun part only, on nmrrer m the pl’tfs decía-ration, it is against him fop that part oi 1 ⅛5 ^e' mand unanswered to till the issue U on theuonlyotie judgment should been-tered‘</p>
- 10 Ky. 557Waters v. Brown (1821)
<p>Tho’ a ded-imus tor taking the deposition of a nonresident be issued in blank, it is yet good if it appears the deposition was really taken before justices of the peace.</p> <p>Oral evidence is admissible to shew the deposition was taken according to notice.</p> <p>™^j,su|tsw¡n not palliate a latter assault ^efif^th'^in* Jury ⅛ inflict" ed in the at-cutkm those threats, defed’t may former^h'r’ts in mitigation °f damages, motives which wflu-t^intiff'* conduct. Tho5 for* threats</p>
- 10 Ky. 561Handley's adm'rs v. Fitzhugh (1821)
<p>On an appeal from a judgment of the jkelson circuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 564Robenson v. Hopkins ex'or (1821)
<p>On reviving a biH in chancery in the name of an ex’or,the deft must be served with process, either actual or implied, before a decree pro confesso, unless deft, has answered in the life of the testator.</p>
- 10 Ky. 565Morris v. M'Millen (1821)
<p> Qn m appealfrm a decree °fthe FmJetie circmt C0UrL </p>
- 10 Ky. 567Bank of Lexington v. Turner (1821)
<p>The bank may prase; ?ute heFsmts & summons,</p>
- 10 Ky. 568Clay v. M'Kinney (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a decree cf the Bourbon circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 570Helm v. Crawford (1821)
<p>Omitingto jectcaU’dfof an entry, which might fecuhe'^osí" ⅛⅞, of^the entry, is fa-*0^, e"‘ ⅞. ojéete called for therein are aIBPyProv«</p> <p>Notoriety of ?he ^absence of stronger of stronger proof, may J?®njnf?rre‘l stances.</p> <p>callin'* forry epecifed'and known ob-de '°ll projrcfaims” and contain-inp- much more than the warrant jus ¡lies cannot prevail.</p>
- 10 Ky. 573Bulors Heirs v. M'Cawley (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Jefferso n circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 577Theobalds v. Fowler (1821)
<p>Aa object of location known by 2 names but easily found by either is a good locative e-all.</p> <p>An entry calling for a survey, can't be attached to the entry on which the surv’y is constructed, but such appen-dant entry, tho’ attached to the first entry, may be good if -it will cover the land in dispute by surveying it both from the original ’titry and survey.</p> <p>An entry the corner of a survey^ready made, but not noto-sustainable”* uni ss the’ corner is formahle^o the entry & canbe known when fcund</p>
- 10 Ky. 580Morgan v. Mullins (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a decree of the Pendleton circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 585Lillard v. Henderson's heirs (1821)
<p> On an appeal from a decree ⅛ the B°°m arcmt c0Urt' </p>
- 10 Ky. 587Horine's Heirs v. Craig (1821)
<p> Qn an appmi jr<ym a ¿eoree 0j th* S^ral court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 594Loftus v. Mitchel (1821)
<p>A survey actually bounded and resided on by the owner, will be presumed to be notorious, and furnishes a good locative call for n adjoining entry.</p> <p>When an entry calls to adjoin the survey of an Other, when that o her has various surveys in the same vi-cinitv, the selection of thf survey to be adjoined will be governed by superior ap itude of one to the other calls of the append-ant entry</p> <p>pecting vacant lands of th's'cotn-warrant is’** dispensed with, »nd a ^''^ade'end patent issu’d ™ payment* of the stafe r</p> <p>A survey made with-®ut *he.®u' owner" of'an entry, does not merge an rate^aiTinja-rytoasubse-quentsurvey: survej°made by authority of the owner oí a part of bridge the owner’s right to survey the whole, provided the sur-veyofa part ® ofthe whole.</p> <p>The certi-ftcstle of die county court of applicants right, is con elusive agnst the com’ith, and all subsequent. purchaser» from her.</p> <p>By the aefap-propriaáng the vacant lands of the com’wlth, an actual personal residence is necessary, and the county courts possess a povyer to grant certificates to such persons only — a set. tlement by proxy will not do, and the certificate holder is bound to shew the place of his actual settlement, if it be called for as a locative object, or conduces to give figure to the survey.</p>
- 10 Ky. 602Redd v. Bohannon (1821)
<p>A surveyor’s report that a seiíuT a'survey call’d lor in an appen-no" roof toe verity that feet corres-the comer trees (if re-por ed) with foTTn the original sar-vey, might shew'that0 fact.</p>
- 10 Ky. 603Smith v. Crow (1821)
<p>In small Streams “the left hand fork ” is to be asc naiiiei hr. ascending the stream.</p> <p>The call for “ the head of a creek” is bad, as a locative, unless some point has acquired that reputation, or nature has pointed out some particular spring as the head.</p>
- 10 Ky. 606Washington v. Arnold (1821)
<p>n , , , On an appeal from a decree °J the L°san arcmt courL</p>
- 10 Ky. 609Foster v. Morris (1821)
<p>Tte • astran*</p> <p>If» plaintiff, in ejectment, evicts a tenant, the landlord is thereby ousted, & the tenant jn*y rightful-⅜ lease from eeviotor.</p>
- 10 Ky. 612Patrick v. Conrad (1821)
<p>on overr«j-⅛ a piff’s demurrer, ⅞⅛ be entered for de- " the demurrer and files a ^ rep ica' ^</p>
- 10 Ky. 613Morgan's devisees v. Gaines (1821)
<p>A will prov’d in a sis ter state, should '^'evidence" to shew title without pro-but6 if such will is proved in Virginia, befors a dioticin, before the sep evidence'1 ** without far ffaer probate</p>
- 10 Ky. 614Bodley v. Coghill's h's (1821)
<p>On an appeal from a jvg~ rt:cnt oj the Jltason cir- - cuit court.</p>
- 10 Ky. 616Bowling v. Ewing (1821)
<p> Om an appeal from a judgment of the Fleming circuit court. </p>
- 10 Ky. 618Patterson v. Carneal's heirs (1821)
<p>she’# selling lands under not^ 'thori* ^d to' seii more of a trfcft an ⅛⅛, if he does so’he aets without ⅛ sale'L*'1'* Void.</p> <p>A clear dis-tin ion exists between an act done without authority, "nd an au bority inf ' tr.a' iv fXeicised.</p> <p>The use nt’ “con- : is equi-law and the</p> <p>mortgage, after a ^hThokts' the’legates-¾> the moi'iKapd ,</p>
- 10 Ky. 622Bodley v. Ross (1821)
<p>Two tenants in common, selling lands, must -anile in any suit for a ¿pecific execution.</p> <p>3 feme brings suit ior that purpose, the xotirt has dis cretion to give leave to amend the bill by adding the co tenant, or to dismiss the bill without prejudice.</p>
- 10 Ky. 623Campbell v. Roberts (1821)
<p>evTdence'ot'3 title a^amst an intruder ⅜xthouttule,</p>