Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 La. 350

Sprigg v. Hooper

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1836

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1836-10-15

Western Disx. APPEAL EROM THE COURT OE TIIE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE PARISH JUDGE OE THE PARISH OE RAPIDES PRESIDING. This is, essentially, a petitory action, and one of bornage. The plaintiff Sprigg, alleges he is the owner of a tract of land, having eight arpents front on Bayou Robert, with the usual depth, bounded above by lands of Fiske, and below by Thomas Hooper, the defendant.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1836-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1921

3 state decisions

101836184018501860187018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Matthews, J.,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2This is a petitory action, in which the plaintiff and intervenor, Fiske, claim titles to land adjoining a tract in *352possession of the defendant, and require a boundary to be established and fixed between the parties. A jury to whom the case was submitted, found a verdict by which the defendant was quieted in his possession of the disputed premises; and, from a judgment rendered thereon, the plaintiffs appealed_ ;

Where the de-iendanlisinpos-session, and the ncTtiflef he cannot recover.is no judgment between61 C!the same parties, about the contested premises, the plea of res judicata cannot be sustained.

¶3It is an incontrovertible principle of law, that a plaintiff in a petitory action can only recover on showing a valid title in himself. In the present instance, the claimants of title have shown none to the land admitted to be in the possession of defendant, and no judgments in former cases between the same parties, relating to the thing at present in contest, , , , , . , , ,, ¶ * . 7. . nave been shown, which support the plea of res judicata*

¶4it is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the ■judgment of the District Court be affirmed, with costs.

/10/la/350 · .json · Public domain