Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 La. Ann. 532

State v. Gilbert

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 15, 1855

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1855-07-15

<p>The party to an appeaxamce bond will not be bound where the requisites of the law have not been observed in taking at.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1911

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1855-07-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Spoitord, J.

¶1The defendants have .appealed from a judgment against them upon a forfeited appearance bond.

¶2The Clerk certifies that the record contains all the documents filed, proceedings had, and evidence adduced, in the case.

¶3The defendants opposed the forfeiture of the bond in the Court below, on the special ground that there was no order of Court authorizing the Sheriff to *533take the bond, and that it was not taken by the Judge, or by any person duly authorized.

¶4The bond is attested by the Deputy Sheriff, and does not appear to have been taken in open Oourt.

¶5We find no order of the Court admitting the accused to bail, fixing the amount of the bond to be given, or authorizing any person to take it.

¶6A diminution of the record has not been suggested.

¶7This matter has been the subject of so many adjudications, that it is surprising to find the most palpable requisites of the law neglected by officers who are charged with the duty of securing the appearance of persons accused of crime. State v. Clendennin, 6 An. 744. State v. Longuineau, 6 An. 700. State v. Harper, 8 An. 598. State v. Hays, 4 An. 59. State v. Jones, 8 An. 10. State v. Sewall, 3 An. 575.

¶8It is ordered that the judgment of the .District Court be reversed, and that the State take nothing by its motion.

/10/laann/532 · .json · Public domain