Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 Mass. 163

Gray v. Storer

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1813-05-15

This was a writ of error, brought to reverse a judgment of this court, rendered February term,’ 1802, between these parties, a report of which was given in the supplement to the second volume of these reports, (p. 565.)

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1879

1 state decisions

Cited in Cyclopedic (1922)’s definition of “All The Estate” · Cyclopedic (1922)’s definition of “Cohabit”

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1813-05-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Upon inspecting the record, and finding the judgment to have been rendered on a statement of facts agreed by the [*164] * parties, the Court ordered the plaintiff m error to become nonsuit, and he was called accordingly. (1)Davis (Solicitor-General) for the plaintiff in error.

¶2*173ADDITIONAL NOTE.

¶3[Error does not lie, where the facts proved before the jury are, by consent of par ties, reported by the judge for the opinion of the Court. — Johnson vs. Shed, 21 Pick. 225.

¶4Nor, where a cause is by agreement referred to an auditor, voluntarily chosen by the parties, to report the amount due the plaintiff's, does error lie upon a judgment founded on such report. — Allen vs. Myers, 5 Rawle, 335

¶5But see Smith vs. Moore, 6 Greenl. 274.

¶6See Ward vs. Crenshaw, 4 Yerg. 197__F. H.]

¶772-16"> 7 Mass. Rep. 380, Alfred vs Saco.

/10/mass/163 · .json · Public domain