Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Md. App. 136 - Lashley v. State

10 Md. App. 136 - Lashley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
January 1979
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Jones v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · United States v. Ventresca · Griswold v. State of Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The requirement of a reasonable degree of certainty in legislation, especially in the criminal law, is a well established element of the guarantee of due process of law. No one may be required at peril of life, liberty or property to speculate as to the meaning of penal statutes. All are entitled to be informed of what State law commands or forbids; consequently, a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application, violates the first essential of due process of law. Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U. S. 451 ; Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U. S. 385 .””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.