¶1The action is upon an undertaking executed by the defendants.
¶2The answer denies all the allegations of the complaint except that the defendants had executed a certain undertaking of the general description and character referred to in the complaint.
¶3*785The proceedings in the action in which the undertaking was given were all denied, so that the affirmative of the issue was upon the plaintiffs and, it was properly accorded to them.
¶4The defense relied upon a counterclaim.
¶5But it appeared by the documentary evidence offered by the plaintiffs that the same matters pleaded had been adjudicated adversely to the defendants’ assignors in a litigation to which they were privies, and they were, therefore, precluded thereby.
¶6Under these circumstances the, trial judge properly directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, and as there are no errors requiring a new trial, the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
¶7Newbubgeb, J., concurs.
¶8Judgment affirmed, with costs.