10 Misc. 2d 22 - Hasday v. Barocas’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross (1977), 362 F. Supp. 1005 - Yonofsky v. Wernick (1973)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Meinhard v. Salmon · Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co. · Newton v. . Porter · Schantz v. . Oakman · Green v. Graves
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the parties have so joined their property, interests, skills and risks that for the purpose of the particular adventure their respective contributions have become as one and the commingled property and interests of the parties have thereby been made subject to each of the associates on the trust and inducement that each would act for their benefit....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“An indispensable essential of a contract of partnership or joint venture ... is a mutual promise or undertaking of the parties to share in the profits of the business and submit to the burden of making good the losses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.