Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 MONT 5 - Ide v. Leiser

Ide v. Leiser’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
23
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Keogh v. Peck (1925), Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee (1953)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 90 state decisions — followed in 23 states

23018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woodruff v. Woodruff · Black v. Woodrow · Baumann v. . Pinckney · Schroeder v. Gemeinder · Thorne v. Deas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The first is the actual transfer of title from grantor to grantee, by appropriate instrument of conveyance. The second is a contract to be performed in the future, and if fulfilled, results in a sale. It is a preliminary to a sale, and is not the sale. Breaches, rescission, or release may occur, by which the contemplated sale never takes place. The third, an option, originally, is neither a sale nor an agreement to sell. It is simply a contract, by which the owner of property (real estate being the species we are now discussing) agrees with another person that he shall have the right to buy his property, at a fixed price, within a time certain. He does not sell his land; he does not then agree to sell it; but he does then sell something, viz., the right or privilege to buy at the election, or option, of the other party.” (p. 11.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.