Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 NC 211 - Wilkes v. Slaughter.

Wilkes v. Slaughter.’s Empirical Analysis

1824

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
April 1987
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1987

3 state decisions

1018241830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “custody implies physical force sufficient to restrain the prisoner from going at large....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.