Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 N.C. App. 355 - State v. Pitts

10 N.C. App. 355 - State v. Pitts’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1972
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. New York · State v. Williams · State v. Conrad · State v. Hatcher · State v. Hartsell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A preliminary hearing is not an essential prerequisite to the finding of a bill of indictment. State v. Hartsell, 272 N.C. 710 , 158 S.E. 2d 785 (1968). A defendant who is tried on a bill of indictment, as this defendant was, is not entitled to a preliminary hearing on the bill of indictment as a matter of right. 4 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Indictment and Warrant, § 1, p. 335. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.