10 Neb. Ct. App. 605 - State v. Spidel’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the display of the human male or female genitals or pubic area, the human female breasts, or the developing breast area of the human female child, for the purpose of real or simulated overt sexual gratification or sexual stimulation of one or more of the persons involved,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 17 Neb. Ct. App. 236 - State v. Heslep

2. “It shall be unlawful for a person to knowingly possess any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct, as defined in section 28-1463.02, which has a child, as defined in such section, as one of its participants or portrayed observers.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 17 Neb. Ct. App. 236 - State v. Heslep

3. “contained in Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-1463.02(5) (Reissue 1995), includes”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 17 Neb. Ct. App. 236 - State v. Heslep