Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 N.Y. 500

Averill v. . Patterson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1853

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1853-06-05

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1853-06-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 1931

22 state decisions

80185318601870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The replication in this case states, that the suit alleged in the answer to be pending for the same cause of action, "was discontinued by notice in writing to *504 that effect." Under the former practice a suit could only be discontinued by rule, or by matter of record. (Graham's Prac., 603.) Section 469 of the Code of Procedure, abolishes the previous practice, inconsistent with that act. But the Code is silent as to the manner in which a suit shall be discontinued. It is presumed, therefore, that the old practice must obtain in this case, as expressly recognized by the section above referred to. The plaintiffs do not, as their counsel seems to suppose, aver a discontinuance simply, but follows up that averment, by showing the manner in which it was effected. As this was insufficient the demurrer was well taken. The judgment should be reversed.

¶2All the judges concurring,

¶3Judgment reversed.

/10/ny/500 · .json · Public domain