Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 NY2D 123 - People v. Cull

People v. Cull’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
6
states following
May 1987
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Turpin v. Warden of the Green Haven Prison · Hotch v. United States · Cherubino v. Meenan · Mogis v. Lyman-Richey Sand & Gravel Corp. · People v. Corwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The term ‘rule or regulation’, has not, it is true, been the subject of precise definition, but there can be little doubt that, as employed in the constitutional provision, it embraces any kind of legislative or quasi-legislative norm or prescription which establishes a pattern or course of conduct for the future. The label or name employed is not important and, unquestionably, many so-called ‘orders’ come within the term.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““No rule or regulation made by any state department, board, bureau, officer, authority or commission, except such as relates to the organization or internal management of a state de partment, board, bureau, authority or commission, shall be effective until it is filed in the office of the department of state. The legislature shall provide for the speedy publication of such rules and regulations, by appropriate laws.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “come within the term. . . . We know that underlying the provision was the desire to have all rules and regulations affecting the public filed in one, easily available, central place. We should not strive to read exceptions into the section or construe it so as to permit the official in charge of the bureau, commission or authority to avoid the necessity of filing by attaching the label”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.