Conte v. Large Scale Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2009
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Semanchuck v. Fifth Avenue & 37th Street Corp. · Walters v. Rao Electrical Equipment Co. · Schumer v. Caplin · Teller v. Prospect Heights Hospital · Rufo v. Orlando
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not establish negligence per se, but [merely constitutes] some evidence of negligence, which the jury could take into consideration with all other evidence bearing on that subject.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.