Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 N.Y.2d 430

People v. Zimmerman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1962

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1962-01-11

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1977

Relies on Mooney v. Holohan · Pyle v. State of Kansas · White v. Ragen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1962-01-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1When the defendant was on trial in 1938 under an indictment charging murder in the first degree, the witness Bose called on behalf of the People falsely denied upon cross-examination that he had made any statements in the presence of a District Attorney’s stenographer more than a week before the trial when, in fact, he had previously made such statements, containing material inconsistencies, on May 25, 1937, on June 4, 1937, and on March 5, 1938.

¶2The failure of the prosecutor to make any effort to correct this falsehood and to afford the court or defense counsel an opportunity to examine those statements, which were in his possession, in effect amounted to a suppression of such material *433and prejudiced the defendant in his right to a fair trial (People v. Mangi, 10 N Y 2d 86; People v. Savvides, 1 N Y 2d 554; White v. Ragen, 324 U. S. 760; Pyle v. Kansas, 317 U. S. 213; Mooney v. Holohan, 294 U. S. 103). We decide no other question. The order appealed from should be reversed, the writ of error coram nobis sustained and the appellant remanded for a new trial.

¶3Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster concur; Judge Fuld taking no part.

¶4Order of Appellate Division (affirming denial of coram nobis after a murder first degree conviction commuted to life imprisonment) reversed and matter remitted to the Court of General Sessions for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion herein.

/10/ny2d/430 · .json · Public domain