Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 N.Y.2d 500

People v. Everett

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1962

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1962-01-18

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1962-01-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2002

4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

6019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Fuld, J. (concurring).

¶1The court writes that a confession is admissible, even though obtained from the defendant “ during a period of illegal detention following an unlawful arrest” (opinion, p. 507). I have stated my contrary views in People v. Lane, decided on November 30, 1961 (10 N Y 2d 347), and, in now joining in the majority’s decision to affirm, I would have it noted that I do so only because I deem myself concluded by the holding in the Lane case.

¶2Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster concur; Judge Fuld concurs in a separate opinion.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

/10/ny2d/500 · .json · Public domain