10 Ohio App. 2d 103 - State v. Birns’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 1970
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on 94 Ohio App. 469 - State v. Gutilla
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Such property [the suppressed evidence] was not offered or received in evidence in this case. There is no doubt but that Birns brought into the case the matter of his involvement in numbers operations so that evidence as to the manner in which such a lottery is operated was clearly proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Birns v. Perini
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.