Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Ohio App. 3d 113 - Lee v. Lee

10 Ohio App. 3d 113 - Lee v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2017

18 state decisions

801983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wolfe v. Wolfe · 48 Ohio App. 2d 85 - Swanson v. Swanson · Davis v. Davis · Saunders v. Saunders · Ex Parte Lohmuller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Five conditions must exist before a trial court awards appellate attorney fees as alimony: (1) the supported spouse needed such assistance; (2) the supporting spouse has the ability to pay; (3) the appeal must have been taken or resisted by the supported spouse in good faith; (4) there was reasonable ground for the supported spouse’s appellate position; and (5) the amount of the fees allowed is reasonable. These matters can be considered by the trial court if an appropriate motion is filed there.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.