Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Ohio App. 3d 134 - In Re Murphy

10 Ohio App. 3d 134 - In Re Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 81 Ohio St. 3d 239 - In re Whitman (1998), 91 Ohio App. 3d 157 - Compuserve, Inc. v. Trionfo (1993)

40 state decisions

13019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc. · Griffin v. United States · 117 Ohio St. 481 - Tari v. State · Romito v. Maxwell · State ex rel. Lesher v. Kainrad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “other than one permitted by the R.C., would be inequitable because it would require the court to set aside the dissolution and restore the marriage, a modification of a separation agreement in a dissolution proceeding, because there was no legal provision for the court to do so in the dissolution agreement: "A petition for dissolution of marriage shall be signed by both spouses, and shall have attached and incorporated a 4 No. 15AP-891 separation agreement agreed to by both spouses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Not less than thirty nor more than ninety days after the filing of a petition for dissolution of marriage, both spouses shall appear before the court and each spouse shall acknowledge under oath that he has voluntarily entered into the separation agreement appended to the petition, that he is satisfied with its terms, and that he seeks dissolution of the marriage.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.