Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Ohio App. 3d 143 - Cooper v. Cooper

10 Ohio App. 3d 143 - Cooper v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2025

15 state decisions

7019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 123 Ohio St. 76 - Corbett v. Corbett · Peters v. Peters · 69 Ohio App. 2d 78 - Martin v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Continuing jurisdiction. The continuing jurisdiction of the court shall be invoked by motion filed in the original action, notice of which shall be served in the manner provided for the service of process under Rule 4 through Rule 4.6. When the continuing jurisdiction of the court is invoked pursuant to this subdivision, the discovery procedures set forth in Rule 26 through Rule 37 shall apply.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “retained continuing jurisdiction over both the subject matter and the parties to modify its previous child support order and that jurisdiction could be invoked by motion filed in the original action, notice of which shall be served in the manner provided for the service of process under Rule 4 through Rule 4.6.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “waived any requirement that the continuing jurisdiction be invoked by the husband's motion, and in any event, was not prejudiced by the mere fact that it was invoked by the court's motion rather than the husband's.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.