10 Ohio App. 3d 161 - State v. King’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

39 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ * * * all juror misconduct is presumed to be prejudicial, and the prevailing party (the state, in our case) has the burden to demonstrate that the misconduct was not prejudicial under the circumstances.” Id., 10 Ohio App.3d at 165 , 10 OBR at 218, 460 N.E.2d at 1386 . 2”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Johnson · 81 Ohio App. 3d 348 - State v. Jones

2. “`The theory of our system is that the conclusions to be reached in a case will be induced only by evidence and argument in open court, and not by any outside influence, whether of private talk or public print.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Johnson, Unpublished Decision (8-12-2004)

3. “The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that a person accused of a state criminal violation shall be tried before a panel of fair and impartial jurors.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Kirkwood, Unpublished Decision (12-5-2003)