Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Ohio App. 3d 213 - Ritchie v. Cordray

10 Ohio App. 3d 213 - Ritchie v. Cordray’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably 47 Ohio App. 3d 156 - 37 Robinwood Associates v. Health Industries, Inc. (1988), 61 Ohio St. 3d 375 - G/GM Real Estate Corp. v. Susse Chalet Motor Lodge of Ohio, Inc. (1991)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

8019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sause v. Ward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a contract to buy and sell the property, but only a contract whereby the seller agrees to leave his offer to sell open for a time-certain. Confusion often arises since the option is combined with the main offer to sell and its attendant detailed terms.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “defendants were under no obligation to convey title to a buyer who, even though pressed to close the sale, had given no indication that he could or would pay for the property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]t is well-settled that tender of performance by one party to a contract is excused where it is clear to that party that the other party is unable to perform”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.