Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Ohio App. 3d 253 - Fuller v. Fuller

10 Ohio App. 3d 253 - Fuller v. Fuller’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably 98 Ohio App. 3d 748 - Moell v. Moell (1994), 105 Ohio App. 3d 679 - State v. Miller (1995)

33 state decisions

16019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dehass · C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The ordinary meaning of cohabitation is, of course, the act of living together. What constitutes living together is a question of fact in each particular case. * * * Ordinarily, isolated acts of sexual intercourse during the two-year period, unaccompanied by other aspects of living together, would not constitute cohabitation. Conversely, cohabitation can be based entirely on acts of living together without sexual relations. * * * ” Id. at 226 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[I]f the trial court's decision is supported by some competent, credible evidence going to all the essential elements of the issue, it will not be reversed by a reviewing court as being against the manifest weight of the evidence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Cohabitation usually will be manifested by a man and woman living together in the same household and behaving as would a husband and wife, although there need not be an actual assertion of marriage.” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.