10 Ohio App. 3d 272 - Whiteleather v. Yosowitz’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 120 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably 37 Ohio App. 3d 78 - Stegawski v. Cleveland Anesthesia Group, Inc. (1987), 42 Ohio App. 3d 200 - Campco Distributors, Inc. v. Fries (1987)
3 federal appellate · 120 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,301 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spence & Green Chemical Company and Andrew Spence, Sr. · Vera Croley, Etc. v. Matson Navigation Company, David E. Bouler v. Matson Navigation Company · Rogers v. Peabody Coal Co. · Benjamin v. Deffet Rentals, Inc. · Tucker v. Webb Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that discretion should be exercised liberally in favor of a nonmoving party who proposes any reasonable interval for the production of those materials,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * The adverse party prior to the day of hearing may serve and file opposing affidavits. Summary judgment shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, written admission, affidavits, transcripts of evidence in the pending case, and written stipulations of fact, if any, timely filed in the action, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. No evidence or stipulation may be considered except as stated in this rule. ***”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“*** the nonmoving party as a burden of rebuttal to supply evidentiary materials supporting his position, when the moving party presents evidentiary materials which deny that claim, [citation omitted]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.