Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 10 Ohio App. 3d 72 - State v. Dunkins

10 Ohio App. 3d 72 - State v. Dunkins’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably LeFort v. Century 21-Maitland Realty Co. (1987), 93 Ohio App. 3d 301 - State v. Mann (1993)

55 state decisions

16019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · State v. Bridgeman · Drew v. United States · Ohio v. Hymore · State v. Torres

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law favors joinder for public policy reasons, such as: to conserve judicial economy and prosecutorial time; to conserve public funds by avoiding duplication inherent in multiple trials; to diminish the inconvenience to public authorities and witnesses; to promptly bring to trial those accused of a crime; and to minimize the possibility of incongruous results that can occur in successive trials before different juries.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Robinson, Unpublished Decision (11-10-2005)
  2. “The triple-count provision of the speedy trial statute applies to an accused being held in jail solely on the pending criminal charges. A parole violation is a separate offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Brown
  3. “[i]t is presumed that the jury will obey the trial court's instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Fletcher, 23838 (6-25-2008)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.