Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 264

Davis v. Coe

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Decided November 20, 1899

Cuyahoga Circuit Court · decided 1899-11-20

<p>Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga county.</p>

Decided 1899-11-20

Hade, J.

¶1We hold that a bankrupt’s estate in the possession of an assignee, or a receiver appointed by a state court, after the adjudication and appointment of an assignee in bankruptcy, should be delivered on demand to such assignee in bankruptcy.

¶2Second: This is not modified or changed by the fact that the preference secured to laborers by the statute of the state, differs from the provisions of the bankrupt act on the same subject, nor by the fact that such claims have been allowed and ordered paid after the filing of the petition in bankruptcy and before the adjudication.

¶3Third: The adjudication upon the validity of such claims must be made in the bankruptcy court, which alone has jurisdiction to distribute the bankrupt’s estate to the creditors of the bankrupt, and ample power to protect all valid liens.

¶4The final judgment of the court entered on June 22, 1899, is, therefore, reversed and the cause remanded to that court for the proper order in accordance with this finding.

/10/ohiocirdec/264 · .json · Public domain